Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:55
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Obsidian Reiterates $80 ‘Outer Worlds 2’ Price Is On Xbox, Not Them - Forbes
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Apple Seeds Second Developer Betas of iOS 26 and iPadOS 26 - MacRumors
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What type of crossdresser are you?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Eum labore eaque vel aspernatur magnam modi rem.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What was your best revenge story?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What is some advice for a business?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Which are the latest interior design trends?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Aussie firms Soul Patts and Brickworks' $9 billion merger sends their shares rocketing - CNBC